Score: 4

"Good idea, poor execution."

submission: Remember The Old NG?

date: July 18, 2007

It is a fairly simple idea, reminding everyone what old NG was like, but you could have made it a lot better.

As opposed to just showing us old pictures from the by-gone era, you could have added some info about it, how the older systems were different to the current ones etc. All this seems to be is you just copying+pasting the general content of the old FAQ.

You also missed out other bits that were important, like the audio portal.

If you ever decide to update this, remember to include more information.

Score: 9

"Nice doomsday scenario."

submission: Pandemic

date: February 4, 2007

Great fun, though there are a few scientific errors.

Someone in the world is bound to become naturally immune to it, meaning it will always be impossible to kill off everyone, and when everyone else has died, the succesful gene to survive the pandemic will be in everyone left in the world.

And secondly, even if the borders are closed, it will still be able to infect people , as one of the upgrades is "airborne", meaniong that the disease should be theoretically carried by the wind.

Still, you realesed it at a good time too, what with all the worries about Birdflu in Britain now. Good job.

Score: 2

"You dissapoint me."

submission: Phoenix Wrong: Last Stand

date: January 13, 2007

When I first saw this flash, since I have never been on Pheonix Wright, I was expecting lots of insider jokes that I wouldn't be able to understand.

I was pleasantly surprised when I realised that this was not the case.

This soon went away as I realised all it was was a bunch of audio snippets, taken from various sources, with sprites that I'm not sure you even made yourself crudely lip-synced over them.

Looking at the other Pheonix Wrong entries made by yourself, I can see this is the case with the rest of them, meaning this required even less creativity than I previously thought, as it is no longer an origional idea.

Score: 5

"um.. err..."

submission: Tutorial: Draging Objects

date: December 13, 2006

the tutorial was good, taught me everytinhg i wanted to know about dragging objcts, one problem though, the audio.

you spoke quite quielty, so sometimes i couldn't hear what you were saying, speak up next time.
secondly, you stalled alot and said theings like "umm.. errr...", if you wirte out what you want to say beforehand, then it will sound more fluent, as opposed to just making it up on the spot.

Score: 10

"Great!"

submission: Purgatorium

date: December 2, 2006

you have really got me hooked on the exmortis series, and this "spin off" (as some may call it) is the icing on the top of the cake. made me jump a few times, and now i have a horrible paranoid feeling.

keep up the good work.

Score: 7

"quite a fun little game."

submission: Dobble

date: November 29, 2006

i enjoyed it, and the graphics were nice. i cannot see any major issues you might want to change, but sometimes when i jumped to a platform right above my characters head, he wouldn't jump high enough to get his feet on the platform, but would still land there anyway.

Score: 4

"simple, yet addictive idea."

submission: Button Chase

date: November 28, 2006

i kept getting stuck on the last level, and going back to do it again.

the graphics need improving for next time, and i think that it would look good if you had a motion tween occuring between the button as opposed to it randomly jumping around, though that might make it too easy. make it have more levels next time.

how did the button choose where to go, did it jump around randomly, in relation to the mouses position, or on a fixed course? becasue i believe that it would be more fun if it appeared some distance far away from where your mouse is.

keep up the good work.

Score: 9

"a very basic idea."

submission: Smart bomb

date: November 18, 2006

yet it was surprisingly addictive.

some problems i found were that on the city(?) levels i had difficulty knowing which areas i could fly over, and which areas caused me to crash, make it clearer next time.

other than that, good.

Score: 9

"bit short"

submission: Project Pravus

date: October 31, 2006

other than that, good. though it does need a better backstory, and i don't understand what the occult sounding words had to do with the story.

p.s. what was the strange noise in the fireplace about?

Score: 10

"most shows deteriorate with time"

submission: Retarded Animal Babies 17

date: October 23, 2006

but i'm glad to see that RAB is still as funny as hell. keep up the good work.